Americans
Americans patriot constitutionalist
Proposed gun legislation in many states and this is what you need to know, and why it is unlawful Legislation.
Do the states or the federal government
have unlimited authority and powers?
the answer is Absolutely NO! and this is Why.
The enumerated Restraints ( The Bill of rights) on the exercise of power are not subject to interpretation
or modification by the entity the restraints are being imposed upon, the
restraints imposed by the amendments which were adopted years after the
Constitution was ratified to override the legislative, executive, and judicial
or administrative powers of the government.
If this were not the case the
restraints would be meaningless! because the government could simply circumvent
them modify them or remove them at will.
Why would the states have requested and adopted enumerated
restraints on the Government and all Government's (states and federal
government ) power! subsequent to the Ratification of the Constitution, if the
government possessed the authority or powers to nullify them?
You only have to ask these individuals in
government one question, where do their authorities come from to violate our
rights? Because they do not have any authority to do this!
A government created of, by, and for the people was never designed to govern the people, it was designed to govern the government, why would a free and independent people create a government to govern them? It would put their liberties and freedoms at risk to have a government govern the people Is this not a self-evident truth?
Nowhere in the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence or the Bill of Rights is the authority granted through the emoluments given to government agents or agencies to violate the people's rights! and this would be a violation of the emoluments
the clause in the Constitution, along with treason and tyranny to overthrow this
A republic form of government and to replace it with a foreign government's
ideology and that is what makes it treason.
Marbury vs Madison (1803) The U.S. Supreme
court case (1803)
established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to
declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion
was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.
The truth is the People created the legislative body, The legislative body created the judiciary, so the judiciary is inferior to the legislative body, the legislative body was created first by the people, and all Political powers flow through the people, The creator cannot be inferior to the creation.
Murdoch versus Pennsylvania you cannot convert a right into a privilege.
Miller versus the US, no right can be converted into a criminal act.
"Any law repugnant to the Constitution is null and void" For effect.
If the charging or the accusing body, cannot prove the charges are law, they have no subject matter jurisdiction, and are performing piracy of rights or Barratry!
The Constitution of the United States of America is supreme law over, executive orders, statutes, codes, regulations, or policy!
What would be the purpose of having the federal government if it was not to keep the states in check and within the parameters of the Constitution, there would be no need to have a federal Constitution if the states could violate it at will! That's why the states created the federal government to make sure that all of the states stayed within the parameters of a Republican form of government, this is also why all members of government must take an oath of office to uphold and protect the Constitution, to keep everyone within the parameters of our form of government, and from violating the parameters of the Constitution, would it not be an act of perjury and treason
for one to take an oath of office and to premeditatedly violate that solemn office?
The creation can never be greater than the creator, from the maximum of law.
That's why our laws were handed down from the creator God, Man's law can never be greater Then GOD's law.
Wicked men know not justice, but a just man will understand all things.
Wicked men know not justice because they do not know GOD! GOD is the creator of liberty and justice.
Look up Murdoch versus Pennsylvania 319 U.S. 105 1943
the court concluded that my write cannot be converted into a privilege license and have fees attached to it. This case is still recognized as law.
6.1 8.1951 - 2 Hobbs act- extortion by force, violence, or fear
6.18 .1951 -3 Hobbs act-unlawful taking by force, violence or fear defined
6.18.1951-7 Hobbs act affecting interstate commerce
Marbury versus Madison five US 137 the Constitution of the United States is supreme law of the land any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law case brought under article 3 section 2 clause 2 of the Constitution.
Murdoch versus Pennsylvania 319 US 105 a state cannot impose a charge for the employment of the right by the federal Constitution. No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege license it and attach a fee to it.
US versus Miller 2.30 F2D 486 the claim to exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.
SHERER versus.CULLEN 481 F. 946 there can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional rights.
It's mandatory in accordance with the Constitution that every state is a constitutional Second Amendment state, if they do not follow the Constitution they are outside the parameters of article 4 section 4 of the Constitution, which guarantees to every state a Republican form of government, also any legislator who does not support the Constitution has performed by his/her non-support of the Constitution, has perjury against his/her oath of office which is an impeachable offense.
Rights travel with you wherever you go, if the state claims that your rights do not travel with you they have breached the contract between the state and federal government, and the state is now liable for breach of contract and any damages caused by that breach.
Rights are not privileges and are not subject to conditions, privileges have conditions rights do not have conditions Rights come with responsibilities that is the difference between a right and a privilege owning and possessing a firearm is not a privilege! it is a right! Anyone trying to take another's rights away is committing a crime because rights are property, so anyone trying to remove someone's rights is performing theft of property.
GUEST POSTING: WOULD YOU LIKE TO BE PUBLISHED ... DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ON YOUR MIND?
****************************************************************
 |
Red Skelton's Pledge of Allegiance |
OPINION CONTRIBUTOR
One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. -- Plato (429-347 BC)
Knowledge Is Power And Information is Liberating: The FRIENDS OF LIBERTY BLOG GROUPS are non-profit blogs dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.
Note: We at The Liberty Tree Friends & Patriots cannot make any warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information.
Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest, Twitter, Tumblr, MEWE,
LibertygroupFreedom 
The LIBERTY TREE is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to Educate, protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.
WE THE PEOPLE
Please SHARE this now! The Crooked Liberal Media will hide and distort the TRUTH. It’s up to us, Trump social media warriors, to get the truth out. If we don’t, no one will!
Share this story on Facebook and let us know because we want to hear YOUR voice!
❦❧❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦
No comments:
Post a Comment